[klibc] Re: klibc integrated with the 2.5.8-rc2 kernel

[H. Peter Anvin]

Jon Smirl wrote:
> Where will the master copy be kept in the long run, the kernel tree or
> a standalone tree? Another tactic would be to make the standalone tree
> directory structure match the one in the kernel tree. If the kernel
> tree is the long run target there has to be some scheme for generating
> diffs that match the tree.

It more or less does.

> If you don't like the free bk license send Bitmover an email and they
> may give you a free copy of the commercial version. The commercial
> license doesn't have the restriction about working on another version
> control system.

I think that'd happen when hell freezes over.

Anyway, I have already thought about how to do this in the long term, 
and I'm not concerned; what's more of an issue is how to do it in the 
*short* term, before kernel integration, in particular how to make thing 
work for Sam as well as me.

	-hpa