[klibc] Re: klibc integrated with the 2.5.8-rc2 kernel

Rogelio Serrano rogelio at smsglobal.net
Sat Jul 31 00:27:07 PDT 2004

On 2004-07-30 23:15:36 +0800 H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> 

> Jon Smirl wrote:
>> Where will the master copy be kept in the long run, the 
>> kernel tree or
>> a standalone tree? Another tactic would be to make the 
>> standalone tree
>> directory structure match the one in the kernel tree. If the 
>> kernel
>> tree is the long run target there has to be some scheme for 
>> generating
>> diffs that match the tree.
> It more or less does.
>> If you don't like the free bk license send Bitmover an email 
>> and they
>> may give you a free copy of the commercial version. The 
>> commercial
>> license doesn't have the restriction about working on another 
>> version
>> control system.
> I think that'd happen when hell freezes over.
> Anyway, I have already thought about how to do this in the 
> long term, and I'm 
> not concerned; what's more of an issue is how to do it in the 
> *short* term, 
> before kernel integration, in particular how to make thing 
> work for Sam as 
> well as me.
> 	-hpa

I expected you to say that. ;-)

Im surprised integration is going to happen soon.

More information about the klibc mailing list