[klibc] Re: klibc integrated with the 2.5.8-rc2 kernel
rogelio at smsglobal.net
Sat Jul 31 00:27:07 PDT 2004
On 2004-07-30 23:15:36 +0800 H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com>
> Jon Smirl wrote:
>> Where will the master copy be kept in the long run, the
>> kernel tree or
>> a standalone tree? Another tactic would be to make the
>> standalone tree
>> directory structure match the one in the kernel tree. If the
>> tree is the long run target there has to be some scheme for
>> diffs that match the tree.
> It more or less does.
>> If you don't like the free bk license send Bitmover an email
>> and they
>> may give you a free copy of the commercial version. The
>> license doesn't have the restriction about working on another
>> control system.
> I think that'd happen when hell freezes over.
> Anyway, I have already thought about how to do this in the
> long term, and I'm
> not concerned; what's more of an issue is how to do it in the
> *short* term,
> before kernel integration, in particular how to make thing
> work for Sam as
> well as me.
I expected you to say that. ;-)
Im surprised integration is going to happen soon.
More information about the klibc