[klibc] Register parameters are unsafe with gcc 3.3.2
H. Peter Anvin
hpa at zytor.com
Sun Jun 6 14:14:59 PDT 2004
Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>Olaf Hering wrote:
>>>On Sat, Jun 05, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>>Anyone would be brave enough to convert ash to prototype format? That
>>>>way we could use standard gcc warnings to warn for missing prototypes.
>>>Can upgrade ash to a sane level?
>>>We use the netbsd ash, works much better on all archs.
>>Absolutely. I have my hands full at the moment with trying to change
>>the way system calls are handled (necessary to change off_t to be a
>>64-bit type; also happens to take care of uid_t and gid_t being 32
>>bits), but if you'd be willing to make a patch I would love it.
> This is the current netbsd cvs, + printf, test and kill.
I'm a little confused... there were two patches, one which seemed to
have another patch embedded, should I apply one, both or... ?
More information about the klibc