[klibc] Re: kbuild & klibc - heads up

H. Peter Anvin hpa at zytor.com
Mon Aug 1 15:41:56 PDT 2005

Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 03:33:48PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>For -mm inclusion, assuming akpm agrees, I think we can go with it with 
>>the present stuff.  For *mainstream* inclusion we need kinit to work 
>>correctly, which is still in progress (sorry everyone...)
> I don't agree, all we need is one package using klibc in order for
> mainline inclusion.  That doesn't mean we need the whole kinit stuff
> working properly.

True.  kinit was my target, but if there is another package using klibc 
instead of kernel code then it can be merged.


More information about the klibc mailing list