[klibc] Re: kbuild & klibc - heads up

[H. Peter Anvin]

Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 03:33:48PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
>>For -mm inclusion, assuming akpm agrees, I think we can go with it with 
>>the present stuff.  For *mainstream* inclusion we need kinit to work 
>>correctly, which is still in progress (sorry everyone...)
> 
> 
> I don't agree, all we need is one package using klibc in order for
> mainline inclusion.  That doesn't mean we need the whole kinit stuff
> working properly.
> 

True.  kinit was my target, but if there is another package using klibc 
instead of kernel code then it can be merged.

	-hpa