Olaf Hering wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >>might be time to call it 1.0 after that. > > sparc did not compile before 0.200, some signal stuff undeclared. Okay... my sparc box is (software-)busted, so I'm afraid I can't test it at the moment. Or are you saying 0.200 fixed it? -hpa