[klibc] [patch 11/12] Unpleasantness in linux/nfs_mount.h

H. Peter Anvin hpa at zytor.com
Wed May 25 14:49:48 PDT 2005

Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 01:08:19PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
>>>This raises the reverse question: am I allowed to distribute ipconfig and
>>>nfsmount with my GPL package, and if so, do they need extra licence notices?
>>a) yes, b) not sure if it's legally required; I would prefer it.
> Me too, it makes it a lot easier later on for others to decide what
> they can do with the software.
> To make sure I add the right licence, is it correct that: there are no
> explicit licence statements in the current sources, so it falls under the
> default licence given in klibc/LICENCE.  Copying the copyright statement
> from run_init.c to the main.c files from both ipconfig and nfsmount,
> plus a LICENCE.KLIBC in the package top directory is the best way to
> inform recipients of the copyright and licence?

Sounds reasonable.


More information about the klibc mailing list