[klibc] mkinitrd integration strategy?
Erik van Konijnenburg
ekonijn at xs4all.nl
Mon May 30 14:13:48 PDT 2005
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 04:02:45PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
> > That's an important part of the integration, but I think there's
> > more to it:
> > ...
> There is definitely a whole slew of these sort of issues. One thing I
> have considered is to submit as part of integration to invoke /kinit,
> not /init; and let the name /init be invoked after /kinit.
> Right now, though, this is a bit of design-in-a-vacuum, which is why I'm
> hesitant to do this discussion now.
Point taken; let's return to it later. Anyway, good to know this isn't
a discussion that happened a year ago and is hidden somewhere deep in
More information about the klibc