[klibc] Re: [PATCH] Avoid using dc in git-count-objects

[H. Peter Anvin]

Herbert Xu wrote:
> 
> I suspect this is somehow related to the sa_restorer code in klibc's
> sigaction.  What's the i386 breakage that requires this sa_restorer
> code? Does glibc do it as well?
> 

Some Fedora i386 kernels, and *ALL* x86-64 kernels, passes a broken 
return value unless SA_RESTORER is set.  glibc always uses SA_RESTORER.

	-hpa