[klibc] Problems with fread

[H. Peter Anvin]

Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> 
> Well, since you have to check line for line, and klibc did not provide
> fscanf() which was originally used, I used fread+sscanf and reading one
> byte at a time into a 300 byte buffer.
> 

What kernel version is this?  This could be a seq_file bug.  It's 
clearly the kernel that's at fault, though.

fscanf/fgets is part of the reason I'm thinking of at least adding input 
buffering to klibc, as annoying as it is...

	-hpa