[klibc] Re: sys_mmap2 on different architectures

[H. Peter Anvin]

David S. Miller wrote:
> 
>>At this point, I'm more than willing to treat SPARC as a special case, 
>>but I really want to know what the rules actually _ARE_ as opposed to 
>>what they are supposed to be (which they clearly are not.)
> 
> I have to admit I'm totally stumped...
> 
> Why are you invoking mmap2() instead of mmap64() btw?

Most 32-bit architectures don't have sys_mmap64; in fact the only one 
that seem to is parisc, for HPUX compatibility.  I'm trying to keep the 
differences between architectures as small as possible.

	-hpa