[klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
jbailey at ubuntu.com
Mon Jul 3 18:36:33 PDT 2006
Le lundi 03 juillet 2006 à 20:46 +0200, maximilian attems a écrit :
> well but busybox is big nowadays and generally compiled against glibc.
> i'm quite eager to kick busybox out of default Debian initramfs-tools
> to have an klibc only default initramfs. those tools are needed atm,
> and there is not enough yet. afaik suse adds sed on klibc with a minimal
> patch and we'd liked to have stat, kill and readlink on klibc-utils.
> how about busybox on klibc?
I made a brief attempt to do busybox on klibc before klcc was working
right for me. I should try that again. In Ubuntu, we already do a
separate build pass of busybox to get just the features that we want, it
would be easy to play with this.
I'll let you know. It'll take me a couple days - between travelling and
the long weekend, I'm a bit behind.
* Canonical Ltd * Ubuntu Service and Support * +1 514 691 7221 *
Linux for Human Beings.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
Url : http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/attachments/20060703/26116371/attachment.bin
More information about the klibc