[klibc] klibc rejected for 2.6.18
H. Peter Anvin
hpa at zytor.com
Thu Jul 6 02:17:52 PDT 2006
maximilian attems wrote:
> why couple the removal of in kernel code with klibc addition?
> i think the in kernel code should go through the
> feature-removal-schedule.txt procedure.
> such a patch should be the last of the klibc series.
Well, first of all because maintaining multiple parallel pieces of code
is a nightmare, and second because Linus stated that as a precondition
for merging klibc several years ago.
More information about the klibc