[klibc] Re: [PATCH] klibc
maximilian attems
maks at sternwelten.at
Fri Jun 2 01:14:16 PDT 2006
On Thu, 01 June 2006, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Bob Picco wrote:
> >>
> >> -#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__)
> >> +#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__) && \
> >> + !defined(__powerpc64__)
> >
> > Why not just !defined(__LP64__) ?
>
> _BITSIZE == 64 is really the right formula... if I remember correctly, there were some
> 64-bit platforms (Alpha?) which didn't conform, though. I will look at this later today.
>
> -hpa
indeed aboves line contains an mistake by an earlier patch of mine.
-#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__)
+#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__arch64__)
is atm needed to get statfs right on sparc.
--
maks
More information about the klibc
mailing list