[klibc] klibc: s390 errno...
H. Peter Anvin
hpa at zytor.com
Tue May 2 00:53:04 PDT 2006
Heiko Carstens wrote:
>> The former is clearly right and the latter is clearly wrong. Should I change the s390x version to match s390?
> Looks like the right thing to do. Even though -125 seems to be wrong since we
> have already
> #define ENOTRECOVERABLE 131 /* State not recoverable */
> Testing against -4095 is probably better.
I like -4096 better; that way it's effectively an "error page" at the
top of the unsigned space.
Could you try it out and send me a patch? I don't have access to any
s390 equipment or even simulators.
More information about the klibc