[klibc] klibc-1.5 released

[Chris Smith]

>
> > Isn't the initramfs shell one such argument? Getting a shell on boot
> > failure is a major improvement over a panic message...
> >
>
> This doesn't seem to be that strong of a demand, as far as I can tell :(


People who are happy with a distro may lack interest, but the DIY community,
and kernel hacker aspirants like me would enjoy any improved support for
setting up the initramfs.
Initramfs support is a little more clear with the uClibc/busybox approach,
btw.
Best,
Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/attachments/20070307/3a9ca7f0/attachment.html