[klibc] bunch of small fixes

maximilian attems max at stro.at
Sun Jul 13 08:43:20 PDT 2008

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 04:39:32PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > i don't like to *have* to rely on busybox in initramfs as
> > embedded people should just be able to choose BUSYBOX=n MODULES=dep
> > and thus have a smaller initramfs.
> > (yes one can do even better, but i plan to package that postlenny)
> Oh, I'm not arguing with getting klibc chroot fixed, that's obviously
> the right thing. Just saying I'll be doing other things rather than
> rushing out to revert the workaround, that's all. :-)

okay sure no trouble, sorry had thought you wanted that longterm. ;)
thanks for verification

kind regards


More information about the klibc mailing list