[klibc] klibc-1.5.17 build failure on mips
max at stro.at
Fri Apr 16 21:16:32 PDT 2010
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 05:21:49PM -0700, Lei Sun wrote:
> :-), i am scared...
> I am evaluating klibc, i will see what the impact will be, i had to stick
> with 2.6.31 now.
again you give no reason for 2.6.31, I will stop asking, but point
out that this is unsafe and wrong.
> BTW, what is the "klibc-tk2j4gSwFszor6ZV40CWYpeJ5-w.so"
the sha1 hash soname that klibc uses.
if a lib keeps the same soname it should mean that binary compatibility
is kept. klibc indicates that there is no such thing as stable ABI for it.
More information about the klibc