[klibc] proposed faccessat
H. Peter Anvin
hpa at zytor.com
Mon Apr 19 22:49:48 PDT 2010
On 04/19/2010 09:29 PM, maximilian attems wrote:
>>> Implement as wrapper around sys_faccessat().
>> This isn't quite right. I'd suggest we either tweak dash's build
>> to not detect faccessat on klibc, or implement faccessat properly
>> in klibc by doing what the glibc version does.
> if it is not klibc domain to have it we can merge hunk of my
> patch to rename sys_faccessat() to __faccessat,
> then dash config wouldn't see it in klibc and this fun would be over :)
> as sidenote nor dietlibc nor uclibc seem to have it,
> bad that the kernel implementation seems incomplete.
> not really my call, waiting for hpa to weight in.
> although I'd still like to know what you'd miss Herbert?
The easiest is probably to just pull the system call entirely until
something really needs it.
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
More information about the klibc