[klibc] [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Introduce arm64 support

H. Peter Anvin hpa at zytor.com
Mon Nov 11 07:20:04 PST 2013

Yes, that is not an issue, but the question is if the relatively small cost of adding a bit too jmp_buf makes it worth it, as long as people understand that there is no fp support in klibc.

Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd.de> wrote:
>Steve Capper dixit:
>>> Do we need the fpregs saved even though klibc doesn't do fp?
>>For gcc targetting Aarch64, We can only guarantee that d8-d15 are
>>left alone when -mgeneral-regs-only is supplied for building klibc
>>and any software linked against klibc. I would much prefer to
>We can enforce this in klcc, just like -mregparm=3 is used by
>the i386 target.

Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.

More information about the klibc mailing list